rename () renames a file, moving it between directories if required.
Any other hard links to the file (as created using
link(2) ) are unaffected.
Open file descriptors for
oldpath are also unaffected.
If
newpath already exists it will be atomically replaced (subject to
a few conditions; see ERRORS below), so that there is
no point at which another process attempting to access
newpath will find it missing.
If
oldpath and
newpath are existing hard links referring to the same file, then
rename () does nothing, and returns a success status.
If
newpath exists but the operation fails for some reason
rename () guarantees to leave an instance of
newpath in place.
oldpath can specify a directory.
In this case,
newpath must either not exist, or it must specify an empty directory.
However, when overwriting there will probably be a window in which
both
oldpath and
newpath refer to the file being renamed.
If
oldpath refers to a symbolic link the link is renamed; if
newpath refers to a symbolic link the link will be overwritten.
RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned.
On error, -1 is returned, and
errno is set appropriately.
ERRORS
EACCES
Write permission is denied for the directory containing
oldpath or
newpath , or, search permission is denied for one of the directories
in the path prefix of
oldpath or
newpath , or
oldpath is a directory and does not allow write permission (needed to update
the
.. entry).
(See also
path_resolution(7) .)
EBUSY
The rename fails because
oldpath " or " newpath is a directory that is in use by some process (perhaps as
current working directory, or as root directory, or because
it was open for reading) or is in use by the system
(for example as mount point), while the system considers
this an error.
(Note that there is no requirement to return
EBUSY in such
cases -- there is nothing wrong with doing the rename anyway --
but it is allowed to return
EBUSY if the system cannot otherwise
handle such situations.)
EFAULT
oldpath " or " newpath " points outside your accessible address space."
EINVAL
The new pathname contained a path prefix of the old, or, more generally,
an attempt was made to make a directory a subdirectory of itself.
EISDIR
newpath is an existing directory, but
oldpath is not a directory.
ELOOP
Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving
oldpath " or " newpath .
EMLINK
oldpath already has the maximum number of links to it, or
it was a directory and the directory containing
newpath has the maximum number of links.
ENAMETOOLONG
oldpath " or " newpath " was too long."
ENOENT
A directory component in
oldpath " or " newpath does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link.
ENOMEM
Insufficient kernel memory was available.
ENOSPC
The device containing the file has no room for the new directory
entry.
ENOTDIR
A component used as a directory in
oldpath " or " newpath is not, in fact, a directory.
Or,
oldpath is a directory, and
newpath exists but is not a directory.
ENOTEMPTY " or " EEXIST
newpath is a non-empty directory, that is, contains entries other than "." and "..".
EPERM " or " EACCES
The directory containing
oldpath has the sticky bit
set and the process's effective user ID is neither
the user ID of the file to be deleted nor that of the directory
containing it, and the process is not privileged
(Linux: does not have the
CAP_FOWNER capability);
or
newpath is an existing file and the directory containing it has the sticky bit set
and the process's effective user ID is neither the user ID of the file
to be replaced nor that of the directory containing it,
and the process is not privileged
(Linux: does not have the
CAP_FOWNER capability);
or the file system containing
pathname does not support renaming of the type requested.
EROFS
The file is on a read-only file system.
EXDEV
oldpath " and " newpath are not on the same mounted file system.
(Linux permits a file system to be mounted at multiple points, but
rename () does not work across different mount points,
even if the same file system is mounted on both.)
CONFORMING TO
4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001.
BUGS
On NFS file systems, you can not assume that if the operation
failed the file was not renamed.
If the server does the rename operation
and then crashes, the retransmitted RPC which will be processed when the
server is up again causes a failure.
The application is expected to
deal with this.
See
link(2) for a similar problem.
This page is part of release 3.19 of the Linux
man-pages project.
A description of the project,
and information about reporting bugs,
can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.